Trash or Treasure?
Strategically assessing the e-waste problem can
also help organizations identify innovative project
opportunities. For instance, in 2014 IBM, a PMI
Global Executive Council member, partnered with
an Indian research firm on a pilot project to design
and build adapted power packs from discarded lap-top batteries. The project team found that 70 percent of the batteries had enough power to keep an
LED light on more than four hours a day for a year.
The final product, dubbed UrJars, provides a
cheap lighting solution for the approximately 400
million people in India who live off the grid, Vikas
Chandan, PhD, a research scientist at IBM Research
India’s smarter energy group who led the project,
told MIT Technology Review. His team estimates
that UrJars, including an LED light and mobile char-
ger, can be produced for INR600 each—less than
half the cost of a typical rechargeable lighting device
in the country. “The most costly component in these
systems is often the battery,” Dr. Chandan said. “In
this case, the most expensive part of your storage
E-waste projects are also creating job opportu-
nities in developing countries. When PMI Global
Executive Council member Hewlett-Packard part-
nered on a large-scale e-waste recycling project in
Nairobi, Kenya in 2013, the company helped train
locals to run the e-waste collection points as busi-
nesses. And it hopes to use that project plan as a
blueprint for a sustainable recycling system that
can be replicated in other developing countries.
From the Ground Up
In Tanzania, the Finnish and Tanzanian governments have partnered to recover e-waste materials to spur the growth of hardware businesses.
Tanzania Science and Technology (TANZICT) is
an e-waste recovery initiative underwritten by the
Finnish Ministry for Foreign Affairs that draws
technical support from U.K. not-for-profit Tech-fortrade. One of the program’s first projects was
to create a workshop at TANZICT’s innovation
center in the city of Dar es Salaam to teach local
metalworkers how to recover materials from paper
printers and scanners and use them to build 3-D
printers. Thanks to the workshop and with the
support of the TANZICT team, workers began
building printers in January.
Fortunately, easy access to bulk e-waste means
the team has ample material to work with. That
lowers the cost of production, which is key to the
success of this project, says Jacqueline Dismas,
head of TANZICT’s 3-D printer development
project, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. “3-D printers
are very expensive. If we can make them locally
by accessing materials found in the country, we
can provide this technology at a much lower cost,”
she says. The project team was scheduled to start
selling printers to the public by April, at a cost 70
percent below that of imported 3-D printers.
A comprehensive and collaborative approach
to managing the rising tide of e-waste—spanning
product planning, disposal and recycling—is the
best way to respond to this global problem, Dr.
Kuehr says. “The companies that make these products must take responsibility, and team up with
other players in the industry to share information
—Sarah Fister Gale
“E-waste is an issue
that must be addressed
collaboratively, by multiple
stakeholders. Each project
plan must be adapted to
the local conditions of the country.”
—Ruediger Kuehr, PhD, United Nations University Institute for the
Advanced Study of Sustainability, Bonn, Germany
Nearly
50
million
metric
tons of
electronic
refuse is
produced
annually.
Source: United Nations
University’s Solving the E-waste
Problem (Step) Initiative